On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:04:34PM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:44:35AM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +0000, Evan Lavelle wrote: > > > RHEL (and CentOS) 5.3 has support for Fedora 10 (and above) domUs, and Fedora 11 > > > should have, as well. > > > > Just there is at least one critical problem with Fedora 10 DomU and also one > > for Fedora 9 DomU, so Fedora 10 kernels can't run stable. :( > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478414 > > > > Your problem is with an F8 Dom0... Not exactly. On my F8 Dom0 Fedora 10 works well with latest fc8 domU kernel. Just when trying to boot and run .fc10. PAE or x86_64 kernel, it fails in less than 48 hours. > the 2.6.29 kernel that will (hopefully) be in > F11 should sort out most of the paravirt problems, from what I can see. I'm > not sure what the status of the code in EL5.3 is, maybe the RH people > can comment. I think it will not be in 2.6.29. Although http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps says thatit's planned for 2.6.29, I can't see any progres in 2.6.29-rc2 changelog: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.29-rc2 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.29-rc1 I think, 2.6.29 is closed for large changes. Or I missed something? SAL -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
