Re: New kernel-xen in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:32 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

> I still think it might be a good idea to keep separate kernel-xen until
> upstream has "all" the needed features.. 
> 
> Like said, adding dom0 patches should be easier to separate rpm? 

Yeah, it's a trade-off.

But consider:

  a) davej is rebasing the stock kernel up to twice daily; it would be a
     huge time sync to try and keep kernel-xen in sync with that pace;

  b) There's relatively little Dom0 work going on a the moment, so 
     there's little chance of having usable Dom0 patches for Fedora 10

  c) It's not inconceivable that we could add work-in-progress Dom0 
     patches to kernel/devel; the bar would be higher than for 
     kernel-xen, though

I sent a bunch of patches to fedora-kernel-list yesterday:

  https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/2008-July/thread.html#00062

Cheers,
Mark.

--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General]     [Fedora Music]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux