On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:13 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 19:10 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:26:58PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Just a heads up that I'm pushing a new 2.6.27 based kernel-xen to > > > rawhide. This includes Jeremy Fitzhardinge's xen-64bit tree[1] in place > > > of Eduardo's xen-pvops-64.git tree. > > > > > > Basically, Jeremy has half of the 64 bit Xen work merged for 2.6.27 > > > already and the other half is queued up, hopefully to be included before > > > the merge window ends. If we can get that stuff some testing, perhaps it > > > might help the cause of getting it merged. > > > > > > This is all irrelevant if the build fails, of course :-) > > > > Seems to have succeeded, so how about putting it into the real kernel > > RPM directly, and finally kill kernel-xen as an RPM :-) > > Yes, I'd very much like to make that happen soon. > > There are two considerations, though: > > 1) The second half of the xen x86_64 DomU work has not yet been > merged upstream. It's a fairly big patch: > > 49 files changed, 2344 insertions(+), 913 deletions(-) > > so, if it doesn't get merged, Sweet, Ingo has just pushed it up to Linus: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/21/201 Cheers, Mark. -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
