RE: virt* source

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	I can't give you any good information on the source and configure options and whatnot, but assuming that there is a hardcoded executable path that doesn't match where you want to build to, wouldn't a hardlink do the trick?  On the other hand, if the install path in the source you want to build is hardcoded, I guess I have no thoughts, but hopefully someone does.
	Dustin

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-xen-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Summerfield
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 18:06
To: Fedora Xen
Subject:  virt* source


I've checked out the source virt*, but I cannot tell that it's newer 
than I have.

The changelog for virt-manager suggests not.

Mercurial doesn't set file times to those on the server, so they reflect 
when I checked it out rather than what's in the repo.

I planned to build from source and install to /usr/local, but this 
suggests my idea is impractical:

virtinst--devel/virtinst/ParaVirtGuest.py:        cmd = 
["/usr/bin/virsh", "console", "%s" %(self.domain.ID(),)]

Surely, the location of executable components should not be hard-coded 
in the source tree. I could live with it, grudgingly, if it was set at 
configure time.


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen



--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General]     [Fedora Music]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux