On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:22:24AM -0600, Eric Brunson wrote: > Markus Armbruster wrote: > >John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >[...] > > > >>Please read ny sig. I really do not want off-list replies. Once I have > >>ADSL at home when I move house, hopefully in a couple of weeks, they > >>will simply bounce. > >> > >>Daniel, are you able to sort out the list owner to get replies going, > >>by default, to the list? > >> > >>Thank so much. > >> > > > >This just replaces one set of problems with a different set of > >arguably worse problems, shifting the annoyance from one set of people > >(which includes John) to another set (which includes me). > > > >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > > >Every time you munge a header, God kills a kitten. Please don't do > >it. Thank you so much. > > > > Just because someone writes something and sticks it on the web page > doesn't mean it's correct. > > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml > > I personally prefer the list to set the Reply-To. It came from the > list, it should return to the list, I don't like getting two copies of > replies to my posts and if someone wants to send me a reply off-list, > they should have to work for it. In the end it's a personal preference > and whether you do it or not, each decision has its pros and cons. This pretty much sums it up. No matter what the list is set to people are going to be unhappy. So I'm going to make myself happy instead & not change it :-) Regards, Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
