On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:05:14AM -0700, Ben wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > >On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:33:13AM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > >> > >># service xend start > >>Starting xend: [ OK ] > >> > >># xm list > >>Error: Error connecting to xend: No such file or directory. Is > >>xend running? > > > >Could you do 'strace xm list' and post the log as an attachment. > > > >Also, I'm wondering if there is an SELinux polcy fix we missed > >out. Could > >you tell me if you have selinux enabled, and in enforcing or > >permissive > >mode. If enforcing, see if there's anything interesting (AVC > >denials) in > >/var/log/messages, or /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > > I think the problem (and fix) has been described pretty well already > by Guillaume Bougard: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211745 I find it very hard to believe that changing 'Xend changeset: unavailable" to list an explicit changeset has anything at all todo with the problem. All fedora & RHEL xen builds have the changeset info disabled, and it is not used in any functional codepath path related to the hypervisor or kernel. It is merely a bit of user facing info. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
