On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 08:33 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > The important thing is that the fault line is not around drivers, but > around individual chip. Some are working better, some worse, some (ATI > R1**, R2**, intel 8**) were blacklisted as mostly hopeless cases. So Radeon 9250 cards that run Compiz perfectly are now garbage pail kids? I thought we in the free/open camp liked to brag about not needing the fastest newest hardware. I picked the 9250 at the time I built out a set of workstations a few years back not because it was fast but because it was one of the few cards at the time that was rock solid with the Free X drivers and I didn't want to play the games with the closed drivers. Good thing I hadn't planned on deploying GNOME3 anyway. Jeeze people, just how much 3d grunt do you really need for a fricking desktop? Optional bells and whistles? Yea if you got it why not flaunt it but can we keep the base requirements minimal?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
