On 2011/05/05 21:26 (GMT-0400) Tom Horsley composed: > Felix Miata wrote: >> it's just hit or miss > Yea, but having looked at unmodified default font > rendering running various live CD images on all > sorts of different computers, ubuntu consistently > looks better than all the others, so somehow > ubuntu seems to be mostly hit, and fedora mostly > miss :-). Fonts beauty is in the eye of the beholder, besides being a complex subject. RedHat's philosophy regarding patents and licensing is different from Canonical's as well, and apparently part of the difference running live images. A question remains, did or does Fedora equip you to make post-installation changes to get results you can be pleased with, or can't you get there at all? Until and unless Fedora matches up to *buntu's defaults, make sure any demos you make trying to persuade that Fedora is better are made using the highest DPI display you can muster. ;-) -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
