On 04/27/2011 05:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 04/27/2011 07:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 06:56 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> >>>>> Fedora, as a volunteeer effort, cannot. >>>> It's worse. I fear Fedora will loose contributors, because Fedora is not >>>> shipping the DE these users want. >>> We ship every major currently maintained desktop. Which one do you think >>> is missing? >> Adam, please. >> >> All of this thread is about "Gnome 3 not being a replacement for what >> used to be Gnome 2", > Is any other desktop more of a GNOME 2 replacement than GNOME 3? i.e., > would changing to another default desktop result in more continuity? I > would say not. Agreed. Things have derailed. Now the cart is stuck in the mud In other words Gnome and Fedora (Both projects dominated by a single enterprise) haved decided to switch their target audience. Ralf -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
