On 04/27/2011 10:15 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Sure but compared to all the rants about KDE 4.0 during its launch, > there isn't much talk about the fork. I have a alert set on media > reports on it and there has barely been any. Probably it has as much > users as Fluxbox. Reasonably successful but isn't competing with KDE > 4.x in any way. I imagine that Trinity would have gotten a ton of traction if it had been available (or more widely known, if it was available) during the "early days" of KDE 4. >From my perspective, KDE 4 reached feature parity with 3.5 when KDE 4.4 brought back the middle-click window list. Others will obviously have different perspectives, but most KDE 3.5 "refugees" with whom I've spoken seem to have become fairly satisfied with KDE 4 around that time. KDE 4.4 was released in February, 2010, 2 months before Trinity's first release. -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx "If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first." ======================================================================== -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
