On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:03 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > > But that's a bit open to interpretation. For example, it could be said > > (I think I even did) that reboot/shutdown does work, it just takes > > forever. Anyone else think it would be worthwhile to adjust the Beta > > criteria to something like ... > > > > "The desktop's offered mechanisms (if any) for shutting down, > > logging out and rebooting must work and perform the intended > > function in a reasonable time." > > That's against the original intention of the criterion: the criterion is > one of the set that came in from the desktop team, and they specifically > wanted it to be about whether the desktop is able to trigger the action > correctly, not whether the action actually completes successfully. > That's not to say that we might not want to change it, but we could > perhaps split it up, and it's something worth taking note of. Right, I wanted to keep the original desktop use case intact, while leaving room to capture whether the function works as intended. As proposed, I felt it compliments the original criteria, without taking anything away. I was hoping to avoid getting into whether the function was triggered from the console and such, I liked keeping it coupled to the preferred desktop procedure, rather than redefining the procedural entry points. What were you thinking? Something more aligned with the purpose/intent of systemd/sysV? Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
