Re: GNOME Shell extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 03:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 08:59 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > Nice job.  They are very useful.  My personal preference is not to have 
> > the dock extension however. I find it distracting in its current 
> > incarnation.
> 
> I think it sorts of serves a temporary clutch till you get used to the
> new workflow in GNOME Shell.  The reason that every extension is its own
> sub package is precisely because I don't expect anyone to install all of
> them. 

I guess I should leave this here:

nils@gibraltar:~> gsettings get org.gnome.shell disabled-extensions
['dock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx',
'alternate-tab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx']

Hope that helps. One thing that'd be nice if experimental extensions
could be disabled by default and would only be enabled if added to a
hypothetical org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions key.

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux