There was a recent topic raised on [1] with regards it was difficult to find information how Fedora is governed and there has been lot of QA decided this QA voted that in our history which may look confusing to outsiders and our own community since QA has never have voted any QA board to handle any decision making which kinda makes our community more or less self governed and sometimes it happens that those decisions are taken off list and off QA meetings . There are of course people in employment from Red Hat that are paid full time to work in the QA community as there are other Red Hat employs paid to work in other aspects of the Fedora project which in turns begs question who actually hold any kind of authority over any kind of decision making within the QA community. Do we want/need to vote a QA board/SIG that will handle that decision making in the future or would listing of those individuals with some kind of authority/decision/ruling power from the QA community on the QA wiki page suffice or perhaps something else? What do new/recently joined members of our community have to say about this for example do you feel it's confusing when joining QA? JBG [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2011-March/010584.html -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
