On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 22:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 22:54 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > > Hm, which graphics hardware should I choose that is well supported? > > We're doing pretty well with most _real_ (i.e. not VM) cards. Intel is > probably the safest bet, but most NVIDIA and Radeon adapters seem to be > working okay, going off the Test Day feedback. You can take a look at > the individual Test Day results if you want to try and identify specific > cards that are reported as working or otherwise: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-10_GNOME3_Beta > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-03_GNOME3_Alpha > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-22_Nouveau > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-23_Radeon > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-24_Intel > > anything outside of the big three we really haven't done much testing on > and I can't say anything definitive. To a first approximation, I wouldn't expect any of the DRI1 drivers to work (i810, sis, mga, rage128, savage, tdfx, unichrome), if for no other reason than that the max texture size on those tends to top out at 1024x1024, which sort of puts an upper limit on your screen size. But I haven't tested whether "doesn't work" means fallback mode or means crashing in nasty ways. The only closed-source driver with a non-negligible market share - that isn't nvidia or fglrx - that you might try this with is Poulsbo. I don't remember how their libGL setup works offhand, but if it's like DRI2 then it might work and you of course get to keep both pieces when it doesn't. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
