On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:33 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
+AD4 On 02/10/2011 01:34 PM, James Laska wrote:
+AD4 +AD4 +ACM F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
+AD4 +AD4 +ACM Date: 2011-02-11
+AD4 +AD4 +ACM Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) +AFs-1+AF0
+AD4 +AD4 +ACM Location: +ACM-fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
+AD4 +AD4
+AD4 +AD4 Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
+AD4 +AD4 15. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
+AD4 +AD4 Alpha release criteria +AFs-2+AF0, should stay on the list, and are getting the
+AD4 +AD4 attention they need.
+AD4 +AD4 +ADw-snip+AD4
+AD4
+AD4 Would Bug 676519 - anaconda 15.19 fails to assemble software raid 10 device
+AD4 qualify?
Hey Clyde+ACE
I've added it to the list for discussion.
At a quick glance, I don't +ACo-think+ACo it qualifies for Alpha criteria. It
most definitely qualifies for the Final release +AFs-1+AF0.
The installer must be able to create and install to any workable
partition layout using any file system offered in a default
installer configuration, LVM, software, hardware or BIOS RAID,
or combination of the above
... and maybe the Beta, although RAID-10 isn't explicitly mentioned.
The installer must be able to create and install to software,
hardware or BIOS RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5 partitions for
anything except /boot
Feel free to join the meeting if possible, and help us understand the
failure, or adjust the criteria if needed.
Thanks,
James
+AFs-1+AF0 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora+AF8-15+AF8-Final+AF8-Release+AF8-Criteria
+AFs-2+AF0 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora+AF8-15+AF8-Beta+AF8-Release+AF8-Criteria
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
