On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 21:25 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > > my thought there is that some people may want to get news from some > > fedora teams but not all. We could just have a central fedora microblog > > account (maybe we already do, I don't know), but it would have to only > > post really big news from any particular team, or else it'd just be too > > much and people would be overwhelmed with things they don't care about. > > A team specific account would let us post slightly smaller news and be > > confident it was going out to people who were interested. same reason we > > don't just have one big Fedora mailing list :) > > Ah I think you misunderstood me a bit here what I was proposing was that > marketing team has the necessary access and handles all the publishing > stuff through the QA channels but any QA community member can give them > content/drafts they review/rewrite to marketing standards then publish > for us through those channels although I'm not sure which service the > marketing team offers other community's within the project. Ah, I see. If the marketing team would go for that, sure! If not we might want to do it ourselves anyway =) I'll ask. > >> I dont think getting the whole QA community to tweet post on identica fb > >> and what not is a great idea. > >> > >> Oh btw arent you supposed to be our public relation aka front man ;) > > well sure, but I'm trying to solve the 'bus' issue here - I could just > > set up an account which only I had access to and say 'hey, here it is' > > but that's not very community-friendly and doesn't work well if I get > > run over by a bus tomorrow :) > > What I mentioned above would solve your issues with buses ;) Indeed! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
