On 02/02/2011 09:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 20:50 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > >> From my perspective I think marketing team should handle all frontier >> stuff ( or a single person ) from us and we just deliver content to that >> team ( or that person ) and they put it into people speak and sprinkle >> some of that marketing dust over it. > my thought there is that some people may want to get news from some > fedora teams but not all. We could just have a central fedora microblog > account (maybe we already do, I don't know), but it would have to only > post really big news from any particular team, or else it'd just be too > much and people would be overwhelmed with things they don't care about. > A team specific account would let us post slightly smaller news and be > confident it was going out to people who were interested. same reason we > don't just have one big Fedora mailing list :) Ah I think you misunderstood me a bit here what I was proposing was that marketing team has the necessary access and handles all the publishing stuff through the QA channels but any QA community member can give them content/drafts they review/rewrite to marketing standards then publish for us through those channels although I'm not sure which service the marketing team offers other community's within the project. >> I dont think getting the whole QA community to tweet post on identica fb >> and what not is a great idea. >> >> Oh btw arent you supposed to be our public relation aka front man ;) > well sure, but I'm trying to solve the 'bus' issue here - I could just > set up an account which only I had access to and say 'hey, here it is' > but that's not very community-friendly and doesn't work well if I get > run over by a bus tomorrow :) What I mentioned above would solve your issues with buses ;) JBG -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test