On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:31 PM, mike cloaked <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Rahul Sundaram (metherid@xxxxxxxxx) said: >>> > But it doesn't make any sense. gnome-panel does *not* require >>> > gnome-shell. We really shouldn't just go around abusing dependencies to >>> > make upgrades 'work', even if it is convenient. >>> >>> I think users upgrading from a previous release can continue to get the >>> fallback mode unless they do a group installation or try to install >>> GNOME Shell specifically. >> >> How so? When we included KDE 4, we didn't leave users on KDE 3 on >> upgrade. >> >> Similarly, when a user has GNOME installed (and yes, the gnome-panel >> is GNOME), and they upgrade, they'll get the current version of GNOME. >> And that's GNOME Shell. > > Unless of course they have no gnome-shell-capable hardware which may > not be insignificant numbers! In that case gnome-session will detect that and start the fallback (still no valid case against it being installed). -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
