On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:02 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:35:27 -0500, > Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 22:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 09:11 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > > > > I've added the dependency to gnome-panel. That should achieve the same > > > > for gnome users on upgrade, without affecting other spins. > > > > > > But it doesn't make any sense. gnome-panel does *not* require > > > gnome-shell. We really shouldn't just go around abusing dependencies to > > > make upgrades 'work', even if it is convenient. > > > > Make a better proposal then. Just doing nothing is not an option. > > The 'natural' place for the dependency would be gnome-session. I have > > put it in gnome-panel to help other spins who use gdm and might not want > > the extra baggage - and see how warmly probinson thanked me for it :-( > > How about this for a proposal: > Have gnome shell obsolete gnome-panel < 2.90 and require gnome-panel, > metacity (since it needs these for fall back). I think that will do what > you want. (Note there isn't a 2.9x version of metacity, so you obsoleting > that gets a lot trickier.) As long as gnome-panel-2.9x isn't packaged > in F13 or F14 as an update this should work. I'm not sure that such an Obsoletes will do anything, as long as a gnome-panel >= 2.90 is in F15. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
