On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:41 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > Actually if your speaking for the Red Hat desktop team I agree with > your point because its clear they have an "I'm right Jack, everything > for gnome shell attitude so screw everyone else" and it seems from my > point of view that they clearly couldn't give a stuff about anyone > else but themselves. And that attitude sucks and I'm getting sick of > going around my packages and spending a lot of time cleaning up the > mess of when one of that team comes and makes a mess all over the > place. Is that really necessary ? Can we have at least one mailing list where we refrain from name-calling and accusatory language, please ? > In terms of dependencies for gnome 3 you may be right but for every > other part of the distribution you are completely wrong, at least on > this space time continuum. There are quite a number of people fixing > dependency problems and its attitudes like this that really piss me > off. We got finally rid of perl in the last release which regained > quite a bit of space for just about all spins for a net win. The > Mobility SIG (mostly me but others as well), the server SIG and the > AOS/JeOS/Virt SIG have been working consistently for a long time (me > for 3 or more years) to try and fix these issues so that is why I'm > getting a little upset on the attitude. The desktop team has not brought perl back. It is getting pulled in by cups, indirectly. Please be at least a little more careful with your accusations. Thanks. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
