On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter Robinson (pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> >> > gnome-shell should not end up being a space problem, if it is you'd be >> >> > worried where the user is supposed to store his/here data ... >> >> >> >> On something like an XO-1 where it only has 1gb of storage anything >> >> extra removes space for user data. And you could have a different >> >> device for /home anyway >> > >> > An XO-1 is a special-purpose device that is probably best served by a >> > special-purpose OS in any case, IMO. >> >> we've had that discussion, please go and read back through the list archives. > > Sure, but compare the space used by gnome-shell + mutter, vs the space > used by xorg-x11-drivers and its dependencies, or all the other kernel > modules that don't serve a purpose on a hardware platform like XO. Yes, I agree wholeheartedly, but that's not what I'm asking for. I'm asking that gnome 2 desktop, that works very well in the non 3D desktop space like the XO, not to be coupled with gnome-shell / gnome 3 dependencies :-) nothing more than that. Peter -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
