Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500,
>>>   Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell?
>>> >
>>> > Yes, it starts gnome-shell, unless your system is not capable of running
>>> > it, in which case it starts gnome-panel+metacity.
>>>
>>> I did a yum upgrade from F14 to rawhide a month or so ago and have been doing
>>> contunuous updates since then. Nothing seems to have dragged in gnome-shell.
>>> It's probably worth thinking about a way to it installed for people doing
>>> yum upgrades from F13 or F14. I am not sure if using preupgrade has the same
>>> issue or not.
>>
>> That is a good point. We should perhaps add a gnome-session ->
>> gnome-shell dependency.
>
> Please don't. There's a lot of devices that can't run gnome-shell but
> can run the gnome 2 configuration perfectly. With dependencies like
> that on devices with small amounts of space you end up with a lot of
> extra stuff you don't want or need.


gnome-shell should not end up being a space problem, if it is you'd be
worried where the user is supposed to store his/here data ...
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux