On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Jason D. Clinton <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 14:32, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Well you'd want to be able to exclude it as well and adding it as an >> artificial dep to something like gnome-session won't allow it to be >> removed. > > GNOME Shell is the shell of GNOME 3 and thus depending on the GNOME Shell > from the gnome-session from GNOME 3 is not artificial but rather a > requirement. The fallback mode is intended as a fallback for driver and VM > problems, not as first-class desktop environment. You will be allowed to > force it to use the fallback mode should the detection fail to understand > your hardware but that's not quite there yet. See here: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-January/msg00008.html > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-January/msg00138.html > > So, doing what you describe from the UI makes a lot more sense (and > explaining why) from a user perspective than, "If you drivers don't work do > this magic with the package manager." The former is helpful; the later is > pain. what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about? Peter -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
