On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I wish I could find the site where I got this information as my >> recollection of it is a bit hazy but part of your problem may be that >> the p4-clockmod and ondemand are more or less incompatible. I remember >> reading something on kerneltrap or something. Basically the latency of >> changing frequencies are so bad with p4-clockmod that ondemand gives >> up on it or something like that. I think I could force it to work on >> my Celeron based EEEPC by manually setting the governor something like >> this[1]: > > yeah, I recall p4-clockmod being called out as problematic in several > ways by some kernel dev or other, but like you I can't recall the > details :/ > > on my system which wants to use p4-clockmod, I just blacklist it and run > full steam ahead all the time. And uses _less_ power while doing so. See: http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/18/forthcoming-p4clockmod/ In short p4-clockmode is broken by design, don't use it. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
