#84: Define install matrix baseline
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: retrospective
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by rhe):
* owner: => rhe
* status: new => assigned
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 jlaska]:
> While we weren't able to actively pursue this ticket during Fedora 14,
some late discussion between rhe and robatino helped identify the core set
of tests that must be re-run on any respin.
>
> To summarize, I believe we want to re-run all of the boot-media
(boot.iso, DVD, CD, Live and PXE) sections,
Agree.
> and a '''select''' group of tests from the ''General Tests''. The
choice of tests from ''General Tests'' is a decision left to the
installation test leads and should be based on the changes introduced
since the previous release candidate. The command ''repodiff'' can be
useful for listing changes between two release candidates.
Yeah, I think the most important is to measure the differences between
these two candidates especially the changes in anaconda.
> rhe + robatino - does that correctly summarize our findings? If so,
what's the best way to resolve this ticket? Would it makes sense to update
the ''Risks and Contingencies'' (see
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_14_Install_Test_Plan#Risks_and_Contingencies
F14 install plan]) section of the Fedora 15 installation plan with the
appropriate wording?
Risks_and_Contingencies has briefly described this condition, but I can
rewrite it with more details. Also do you think it makes sense to mark the
tests whose results were moved from before?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/84#comment:3>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
