On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> dikshie wrote: >> >>> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide? >> >> Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of >> those just done recently was texlive. >> >> -- Rex >> >> > > Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? > It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a > typesetting language .. ;-) > > is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least > isolate this coupling ? > > > > [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at > least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible split that would make it optional. It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support. CC'ing R-owner (spot). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
