On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:38:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:24 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:34 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There would probably be more bugs reported with suspend if the 'components' > > > > > field in bugzilla had a place to put them. > > > > > > > > suspend bugs are almost always kernel bugs. > > > > > > to clarify (based on IRC discussion): bugs where suspend fails entirely > > > are usually kernel bugs (or sometimes graphics driver bugs). bugs where > > > something behaves badly on suspend/resume - say, an app doesn't work > > > right after resume - are usually bugs in those apps. > > > > There is also 'pm-utils' in this picture although a border between > > 'kernel' and 'pm-utils' packages may be here not that sharp. > > pm-utils doesn't do an awful lot and usually does it right; it's rare > for a bug to be there. occasionally a workaround needs to be put into it > for some problem or other, but that's pretty rare these days. See, for example, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624316 which kills video after suspend on a particular laptop running F12 and F13 but which maintainer does not want to touch. There is a patch there. It can be argued that this is a kernel bug but in practice that does not help very much. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546994 is still NEW. Michal -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
