|
Good idea, me thinks. > Subject: Proven tester special testing procedures: PackageKit? > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx > To: test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:01:36 -0700 > > We've talked about special proven testers testing procedures for > kernels, and now another candidate for special test procedures has > emerged: PackageKit. A bug in PackageKit got out in a Fedora 13 update > which broke update notification, which is obviously a big problem. > PackageKit isn't actually on the critical path for F13, but it is for > F14 and up. > > So, I'd like to propose a special testing procedure for updates to > PackageKit (actually, any package management-related critpath update > should be tested in this way). As well as testing package installation, > we should test update notification and installation for such updates. We > can consider different ways of doing this, but an easy way would be > simply to 'yum downgrade' an installed package, then wait: within a > short time (I'll have to check how long with Richard, I think 30 minutes > or an hour), an update notification should appear to let you know an > update is available to that package. If not, we have problems. > > If everyone thinks this makes sense, I'll propose a wiki draft which > sets up a system for package-specific testing procedures and drafts such > a procedure for PackageKit. What does everyone think of this? Thanks! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test |
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
