Re: [Fedora QA] #72: Proposal for reducing test permutations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#72: Proposal for reducing test permutations
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  rhe          |       Owner:  rhe      
      Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  Fedora 14
 Component:  Test Review  |     Version:           
Resolution:               |    Keywords:           
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jlaska):

 Apologies, I missed your latest updates in this ticket.

 Replying to [comment:10 rhe]:
 > I further updated the
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rhe/Draft2#Test_Matrix matrix], and
 I'm not sure if the following tests can be removed or not:
 >
 >  * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img
 QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img]
 >
 > Reason: Not commonly used and require special device to support it.

 I'd like to remove this test, but I'm afraid we need to ensure this is
 functional since it is included in the Beta release criteria
 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria).  I've
 relied on feedback from pjones in previous releases to run this test.
 Mainly because running this test is still a mystery to me.  I agree the
 conditions around this test are not ideal, but I don't have any great
 ideas for improving this right now :(

 >  * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningNoSwap
 QA/TestCases/PartitioningNoSwap]
 >
 > Reason: I don't think No Swap should be separated as a test.

 This test still exists to target the dialog warning that swap is
 recommended.  What do you recommend, should this test be absorbed into
 another test?

 >  * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/KickstartKsFilePathKsCfg
 QA/TestCases/KickstartKsFilePathKsCfg]
 >
 > Reason: Is it a usual way to load kickstart file? I seldom use this way.

 This is how preupgrade and snake delivery kickstarts.  They open up the
 initrd.img and insert the ks.cfg there.  We'll need to continue supporting
 this.

 >  *
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_low_/boot_disk_space_to_install
 QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_low_/boot_disk_space_to_install]
 >
 > Reason:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_from_older_release
 QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_from_older_release] is already the case of low
 /boot disk space. And for upgrading from F13, 500M /boot is enough for
 preupgrading.

 Good point, this should be less of an issue preupgrading from F13 -> F14.
 The remaining preupgrade test is written to mimic a real-world upgrade
 scenario, so we should capture any /boot size issues as they surface.

 > What do you think? Please feel free to add comments and tell me if there
 are other tests in the removing list.

 I can't think of any others at this time.  Thanks!

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/72#comment:11>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux