On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 19:00 -0500, Aaron Faanes wrote: > I believe the proven-testers draft is ready for review. It's grown a > bit more ambitious, but I tried to stay true to the spirit of the > original draft - I did my best to only revise and clarify the content > without affecting its meaning. Still, it requires a look-over by some > knowledgeable folks to weed out inaccuracies, invalid assumptions, > etc. Here's the link: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dafrito/Draft_proventesters_instructions This looks excellent. > The discussion page asks about some other issues that I ran into, specifically: > * The relationship between critpath actions and release criteria They happen to be similar, but they're separate processes. > * A more exhaustive list of critpath actions > * The future of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters and > if any content should be exchanged or merged between the two articles. I think we should keep the separate page, and add a simple link to this page, right after "Individuals must must be mentored and approved before becoming proven testers. A proven tester is a member of the proventesters group.", which reads "If you are interested in becoming a proven tester, please see this page.", where 'this page' is a link to JoinProvenTesters. > * Whether the article should be pushed to wiki/Proven_tester with a > {{Draft}} template. I'd like to do this to encourage contribution, but > that may be premature. Personally I'd be fine with doing that at this point. > I definitely welcome any edits, corrections, and/or feedback on these > questions and the submitted draft! Thanks very much for your work! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
