On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:23 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 10:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:48 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > > > Thoughts on any of this? > > > > Sorry, one further - the recurring issue that always comes up when > > things like this are in question is to remember this is Red Hat's > > Bugzilla as well as Fedora's. Some things that would make sense for a > > project like Fedora wouldn't make sense for Red Hat. I'd like to have a > > separate Fedora bug tracking system, but wishes ain't horses and it's > > not me who'd have to do the work... > > I would be very surprised if Bugzilla did not support setting different > policies for the Fedora "project". I'm not an expert in the area, but I believe there's limitations to the amount of configuration that can be done at that level. Certainly some kind, but you don't have complete flexibility. > I'm not sure what would be gained by having a fully separate Fedora bug > tracker. On the other hand, there are definite practical conveniences > to having Fedora and RHEL in the same bug tracker: user accounts are > shared and direct dependencies can be entered among Fedora, RHEL, and > Security Response bugs. Which most of the time are done wrong, which annoys the crap out of some of us. Me, at least. I hate having RHEL bugs depending on Fedora bugs (or vice versa) when there's no reason why they should... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
