On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 22:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/01/2010 04:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Well, it's a fairly specific issue. If it had been raised for > > consideration as a blocker it may well have been accepted as one under: > > > > "# The installer must be able to successfully complete an upgrade > > installation from a clean, fully updated default installation of the > > previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by booting to > > the installer manually" > > > > from the Beta criteria, given that the 'offending' fstabs were usually > > created by previous Fedora versions, and not user-customized. But it > > wasn't raised for consideration, AFAIR. > I wasn't thinking clearly. I actually meant to recommend that this be > added as a test case. Ah. Well, that kinda depends on what the anaconda team decide they want to do with it - see the bug report, they haven't entirely made up their minds yet, by the looks of it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
