On Tuesday 11 of May 2010 09:15:31 Kamil Paral wrote: > For instance I have reported another one as bug 582525, which > I deem much more serious, and still unfortunately closed as > notabug. well, I think you shouldn't be that shy :-) and just reopen the report if you disagree with the resolution I guess you have enough info to reopen as RFE yourself NOTABUG really is not an appropriate resolution here if this is not going to be fixed, then either WONTFIX or DEFERRED - I know Adam has tons of other stuff to do or CANTFIX - if it turns out that the "fake" DVI power just prevents the state to be determined correctly it may seem a bit pedantic, but ... there exist use cases where you want to know (filter) the bug resolution K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp kavol@xxxxxxxxx :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
