As always, minutes and IRC transcript available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20100503 = Attendees = People present (lines said): * jlaska (92) * kparal (59) * maxamillion (30) * wwoods (29) * adamw (27) * jskladan (15) * skvidal (6) * zodbot (4) * Southern_Gentlem (1) * jeff_hann (1) Regrets: * [[User:liam|liam]] * [[User:rhe|rhe]] = Agenda = * Proposed meeting agenda - http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-May/090560.html * MeetBot summary - http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-03/fedora-qa.2010-05-03-14.59.html == Previous meeting follow-up == * Moved into meeting topics (see below). == Fedora 13 RC test status == Upcoming test milestones: * 2010-04-29 - 'Final' Test Compose]] -- * 2010-04-30 - Final Blocker Meeting (f13blocker) #3 ([http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-04-30/f-13-blocker-review.2010-04-30-16.00.html recap]) * 2010-05-05 - Final Blocker Meeting (f13blocker) #4 * 2010-05-06 - Test 'Final' RC No upcoming test days Please direct ideas for improving QA process to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_QA_Retrospective == Proventesters check-in == The team discussed possible next steps, including ... * Mass subscribing current ''qa'' group members to ''proventesters'' * Updating bodhi to rely on ''proventesters'' group for critpath feedback In order to move [[QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft]] out of draft, what else is needed? * need test guidelines for proventesters (something to explain why they are needed), including how to prioritize update testing * need guidance for mentor responsibilities (manage ''proventesters'' requests, keeping documentation up to date) * Kparal suggesting that ''proventesters'' may mentor others, within some reasonable limits, no need for special FAS group for mentors == Package Acceptance Test Plan check-in == * The test plan is no longer a *draft* !!! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Package_Update_Acceptance_Test_Plan * Next steps ... 1. Create a wiki [[:Category:Test_Cases|Test Case]] out of each test case (see [https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/62 ticket#62]) 2. Automate package update acceptance (see [https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/Package% 20Sanity%20Tests], [https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/Package% 20update%20tests] and [https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/autoqa% 20depcheck]) == AutoQA check-in == Several recent AutoQA updates, including: * jskladan made progress on the autotest-id to the autoqa test front * jskladan is adding more initscript LSB compliance tests to autoqa * skvidal provided a patch to allow maintainers a way to subscribe to AutoQA test results * wwoods finalizing post-bodhi-update watcher, expects a testable watcher by end of week == Open discussion - <Your topic here> == === Please help test MODIFIED and ON_QA bugs === To contribute test feedback, please help test a MODIFIED or ON_QA blocker bug (see [http://tinyurl.com/3ae37qy list]). = Action items = 1. jlaska to migrate approved FAS 'qa' members into 'proventesters' 2. jlaska to request bodhi change to require 'proventesters' feedback for critpath
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
