Caution, this email is overloaded with footnotes! :) On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 08:09 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > The rawhide-lng repo here looks to be several months old: > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/rawhide-lng/ > > Is this repo still useful or used? Not by or for QA, and I don't believe the appropriate fedora-release package references this URL. It was last updated prior to the NFR change to splitting development into Branched and Rawhide repositories. The "Last kNown Good" link was updated based on rats [1] test results [2] [3] [4]. I've added a wishlist item to the Fedora 13 QA retrospective [5] topic around using 'last known good'. Of course, Fedora is constantly changing so our previous definition of last known good likely needs adjustment. Some thoughts to help initiate discussion ... * The definition of 'rawhide acceptance' may need to change since we currently only provide a package repository for rawhide (no install images) * Does the same definition apply to Branched? * If we are applying the package update acceptance criteria [6], is there still value in last known good? * Implementation details ... automatically updating the symlink based on test automation * Implementation details ... should we provide repo configs Thanks, James [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_Plan [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_13_Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_1 [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_13_Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_2 [4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_13_Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_3 [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_QA_Retrospective [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
