On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:56 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:29:32AM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:16 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:00:21PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > > Suggestions welcome (in fact, desired desperately!). This is
> > > > mission-critical for me. Should I use the QRPATHS bitmask?
> > > >
> > >
> > > You can use chrpath(1) to remove RPATHs like:
> > > chrpath -d ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/*
> >
> > At what point should I do that? Should I add it to the evince spec file
> > someplace?
>
> Yup, at the end of the %install section.
Or in this case:
chrpath -d ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/evince/1/backends/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/*
Is this a bug that should be 'zilla'ed?
>
> Jindrich
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Many of projects (such as BDB) contains --disable-rpath config
> > > option but it doesn't work. The chrpath call above doesn't rely on it
> > > and should just remove RPATH from the binaries so that the build
> > > passes.
> > >
> > > btw. just built evince successfully against libkpathsea.so.6.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Jindrich
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Saltzman
> >
> > Clemson University Math Sciences
> > mjs AT clemson DOT edu
> > http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
>
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
