On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:46 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> Also note that evince needs to be removed before the update and rebuilt
> from the SRPM after the update to get the right kpathsea lib version for
> evince-dvi.
And, irritatingly, evince fails to rebuild (at least for me). The tail
of the log is (I think I got all the relevant parts...):
symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevdocument.so.1.0.0.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevdocument.so.debug
symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevview.so.1.0.0.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevview.so.debug
symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevview.so.1.0.0.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevview.so.1.debug
symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevdocument.so.1.0.0.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libevdocument.so.1.debug
4151 blocks
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
*******************************************************************************
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild'
* to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS'
* environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values
* below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000.
*
* 0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
* issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
* providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
* environments.
* 0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
* nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
* 0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
* SECURITY risk
* 0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
* RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
* 0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
* and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
* 0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
* the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
* $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
* $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*
*******************************************************************************
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/evince' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/evince-previewer' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/evince-thumbnailer' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-2.0/libevince-properties-page.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/evince/1/backends/libpsdocument.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/evince/1/backends/libpdfdocument.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/evince/1/backends/libdvidocument.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/evince/1/backends/libtiffdocument.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/evince/1/backends/libcomicsdocument.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/evince/1/backends/libdjvudocument.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libevview.so.1.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.q3CZUt (%install)
RPM build errors:
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.q3CZUt (%install)
Suggestions welcome (in fact, desired desperately!). This is
mission-critical for me. Should I use the QRPATHS bitmask?
TIA.
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
