On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 09:39 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > As per the meeting yesterday[0], we feel that the Join Proven Testers > Policy Draft should be able to be finalized, but as always we'd like > the community at large to take a peek and provide feedback (and come > to meetings!!! :) ). If anyone sees any issues or has any feedback > please feel free to reply with questions, comments, or snide remarks > (just because they are fun). > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft We do love snide remarks! Thanks for drafting this again Adam. Along with some minor wording adjustments. I've tweaked the wiki table of contents slightly. This flows a little better for my eye. But feel free to revert [1] if folks find this offensive. I notice we use the phrases "Critical Path package Wranglers" and "Proven Testers". Are both generally understood, or did we settle on just one? The last paragraph in section "How to Join" seems like it should fit somewhere near the top maybe? This describes the benefits of proventester membership, right? Maybe a "Why join" section above? Thanks, James [1] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft&oldid=167945
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
