Re: Update testing policy: how to use Bodhi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> What are everyone's thoughts on this? Thanks! 
> 
> > Unless we use some sort of value for this feedback, there won't be able
> > to be a way to autopush the update once criteria is reached.
> 
> Is that a bug, or a feature?  I thought the entire thrust of Adam's
> proposal was to make bodhi feedback be useful to the maintainer to make
> an intelligent decision whether to push the package stable.  Auto-push
> is the exact opposite of an intelligent decision.  I think getting rid
> of auto-push would be a fine idea.

That's definitely an option too. Jesse's argument seems to be we can't
expect maintainers to do manual pushes, but in practice I don't think
anywhere near a majority of updates get auto-pushed at present anyway,
given the general lack of people filing feedback. So it seems that we're
already relying on maintainers doing manual pushes, and mostly they do.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux