On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The system could do a count of how many of each type of feedback any > given update has received, but I don't think there's any way we can > sensibly do some kind of mathematical operation on those numbers and > have a 'rating' for the update. Such a system would always give odd / > undesirable results in some cases, I think (just as the current one > does). I believe the above system would be sufficiently clear that there > would be no need for such a number, and we would be able to evaluate > updates properly based just on the information listed. > > What are everyone's thoughts on this? Thanks! Unless we use some sort of value for this feedback, there won't be able to be a way to autopush the update once criteria is reached. Relying on everybody to remember to go back to their update and click the button to make the update go won't work. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
