On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > In that case I'd favour a formula along the lines of "X reports of > 'successful fix' or 'no regression' with no reports of > 'regression'" (where the maintainer sets X). I think the fact that an > update can go out even if several people report encountering regressions > is one of the biggest flaws in the current setup. Any report of > 'regression found' should prevent an auto-push. So that's just separating aggregate positive karma from aggregate negative karma. Basically saying that your update must have a net +3 positive, without /any/ negative. Unfortunately many people fail at understanding what "regression" actually means, and thus can "DOS" an update inappropriately, which is kind of why we've aggregated both negative and positive together. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
