On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 19:26 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > Historically we've used Target thusly: When issues are proposed as > release blocking, and "the powers that be" decide that we wouldn't in > fact delay the release for those issues, we often put them on Target, > which gives developers an easy way to see issues which are "important" > to work on, but not "important enough" to block the release. But really > there is little interaction between the Target tracker and the "powers > that be" beyond the initial dropping. Target has been more for the > maintainers' tracking than anybody else. Just to clarify, the motivation for us (Bugzappers) starting this thread is that it's our belief maintainers aren't really using the Target trackers for this purpose lately. We haven't seen anything to indicate those bugs are receiving any more attention than any other bugs. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
