On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 10:51 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > In the interest of simplicity and not having to revise a bunch of > > pages :), how about we just add a comment to any bug that's accepted > > as > > a blocker during a review meeting? > > > > We already add a comment to any bug that's *rejected* as a blocker to > > explain why we're rejecting it, so this would match that quite nicely. > That works somewhat but is not queryable. True. I'm not really that opposed to using a flag, it's just it'd involve quite a lot of re-education (just when we're getting people used to using the blocker bugs) and editing documentation. I'm not sure it's a significant enough problem to make the disruptive fix an overall benefit... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
