On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 18:07 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:27:58 -0400 > Richard Ryniker wrote: > > > Whenever a default is changed, there is a possibility for surprise. > > "It's broken." > > Whenever there is a changed default that had no reason to change > it is, in fact, broken. NetworkManager wasn't (and as far as I know > still isn't) a replacement for network. Calling it one didn't make it > one. Disabling network and making NetworkManager the default didn't > make it one either. It just broke things. > > The fact that the functions barely overlapped, and the fact that it > would have been absolutely trivial to allow them to coexist if even > a small particle of brain had been applied makes it even more broken. Language such as the above is a quick way to ensure that nobody listens to you or your problems in the future. Try to be excellent to each other. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
