On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 23:52 -0500, John Morris wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:10 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > Because you don't have NetworkManager installed (not in the minimal > > set), and the "network" service isn't set to start at boot time anymore > > (in favor of NetworkManager starting). Anaconda doesn't have code to > > try and guess what service to enable based on what package set was > > installed, so you're left with a minimal system that boots up and that's > > about it. It's up to you to configure it from there. > > And it would just kill someone to add a patch into anaconda to test for > the existence of NetworkManager and fire off "chkconfig network on" > chrooted in the new install if NM isn't present. > > A patch to fix the problem is going to be a lot simpler than even > documenting the broken behavior properly in the release notes, or is > that also going to be left undone because anyone doing a minimal install > should know how to fix it? These are questions you should ask the anaconda upstream. As with any project, what you see is often 1 part design, 2 parts lack of code. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test