Re: minimal install too minimal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:10 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:

> Because you don't have NetworkManager installed (not in the minimal
> set), and the "network" service isn't set to start at boot time anymore
> (in favor of NetworkManager starting).  Anaconda doesn't have code to
> try and guess what service to enable based on what package set was
> installed, so you're left with a minimal system that boots up and that's
> about it.  It's up to you to configure it from there.

And it would just kill someone to add a patch into anaconda to test for
the existence of NetworkManager and fire off "chkconfig network on"
chrooted in the new install if NM isn't present.

A patch to fix the problem is going to be a lot simpler than even
documenting the broken behavior properly in the release notes, or is
that also going to be left undone because anyone doing a minimal install
should know how to fix it?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux