On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:24:52 -0800, Jesse wrote: > > * With repoclosure output, there is no mapping from "broken dep to bodhi > > ticket". Implementing such a mapping would not be trivial. And a different > > strategy of finding dep breakage would duplicate some of what Will Woods > > is working on. > > Hrm, I hadn't thought about multipackage updates, but single package > updates can just be referenced by srpm n-v-r, eg: > > $ bodhi -k +1 --comment "Installed and X still works" > xorg-x11-server-1.7.99.901-5.20100215.fc13 Guess what Extras repoclosure (= the forked repoclosure from Fedora Extras era) does. It prints the src.rpm (and the "related" library packages like mash does it) already, but this is insufficient for submitting automated bodhi comments. The package that suffers from unresolvable dependencies is not always the update that breaks something. For the most common form of dep breakage it is necessary to find the culprit. [That can be anything from a SONAME change to a missing/bad Obsoletes or a forgotton rebuild.] -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
