On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 13:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > No interest due to several reasons, at least: > > * With repoclosure output, there is no mapping from "broken dep to bodhi > ticket". Implementing such a mapping would not be trivial. And a different > strategy of finding dep breakage would duplicate some of what Will Woods > is working on. Hrm, I hadn't thought about multipackage updates, but single package updates can just be referenced by srpm n-v-r, eg: $ bodhi -k +1 --comment "Installed and X still works" xorg-x11-server-1.7.99.901-5.20100215.fc13 > > * Negative karma on updates, which are marked stable already, is useless. True, I'm mostly concerned about things in testing, and double concerned about things in 13-testing. > > * Only the bodhi update submitter is notified about comments, afaik. > That is less useful than mailing to the package-owner@... alias. In one aspect yes it is less useful. In another aspect it is very useful, as we are using karma on critical packages as a barrier to entry into stable. Automatically adding negative karma due to broken deps helps prevent such breakage from hitting the branched 13 repo. If there is no interest, that's fine, I can try to work something up myself, maybe even a script to take your email and do something with it. Thanks again for providing this information! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
