On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 01:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Why is that stuff in -bad and not -ugly, when that's supposed to be the > > point of -ugly? > > -ugly is only for stuff which would be in -good if it weren't for patent or > licensing issues. -bad isn't split per license, it's code upstream considers > unstable and which they probably didn't even bother auditing for license or > patent issues. The problem is that it has codecs which are actually needed, > such as Schroedinger/Dirac support. So Fedora now ships what it can ship out > of it. Maybe upstream should be splitting -bad into -bad and -badandugly or > something like that. ;-) yeah, that's true. I'd wondered about that for a while, in fact. I kinda assumed the descriptions implied that anything with patent issues must go into ugly, but having four groups would seem the most sensible way to do it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
