On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 01:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > > In order to install gstreamer-plugins-bad-free (have updates-testing > > enabled), I had to uninstall gstreamer-plugins-bad (from rpmfusion). Does > > g-p-bad-free replace/obsolete g-p-bad, or will there be a new g-p-bad from > > rpmfusion? > > RPM Fusion should provide an updated -bad. Several stuff in -bad is patent- > encumbered and thus not in -bad-free. Why is that stuff in -bad and not -ugly, when that's supposed to be the point of -ugly? "GStreamer Ugly Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that have good quality and correct functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The license on either the plug-ins or the supporting libraries might not be how we'd like. The code might be widely known to present patent problems." This seems like something we should resolve upstream rather then re-splitting things downstream. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
